Chasing the Fidelity Mirage

In his new book, “Trade-Off: Why Some Things Catch On, and Others Don’t,” and in a recent CNN Money article, author Kevin Maney explores an interesting phenomenon that can happen while pursuing two key qualities in the customer experience. The tension in his example exists in the space between fidelity and convenience.

Maney defines fidelity as the total experience of something and uses Starbucks as an example of a brand that initially mastered the art of creating an authentic Italian coffee bar culture in the U.S. Convenience is defined as just that, something that is readily available. At the start, there was nothing convenient about Starbucks, but it didn’t matter because usually consumers are willing to make a trade-off between fidelity and convenience. In fact, most successful brands do one or the other.

Here’s where Starbucks ran into trouble. There rapid expansion took something that was a special and unique offering in the marketplace and made it ordinary. Once it became ordinary, it lost its aura and customers began to figure out many other more convenient ways to get a comparable cup of coffee. They were trying to live in a no-man’s land that Maney calls the, “Fidelity Mirage,” and have been scrambling to turn back the clock.

This is a textbook example of how the customer experience defines success or failure. Understanding your customer and what they are looking for from your brand and category are essential to your growth strategy. Nobody can be all things to all people and even the attempt to do so can confuse and frustrate your customers and eventually drive them away.

Starbucks isn’t the first and not likely the last to try to pull off this “Fidelity Mirage”. McDonald’s attempted to offer gourmet foods and failed. It’s ironic that McDonald’s is now offering gourmet coffee. Levi Strauss offered a successful Dockers brand only to almost kill their base, blue jeans business.

The way to avoid this paradox is to fully understand your customer and why they are attracted to your brand. A deep understanding of the customer should drive marketing and growth plans. Blind ambition will only create obstacles such as the chasm between fidelity and convenience.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • TwitThis
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
Tags: , ,

6 Tweets

Comments
September 30, 2009

I’ve never heard it explained this way, but I think it’s spot on. In the beginning, Starbucks was about the experience and the customer.

But I will differ from you/Maney on the convenience point. Starbucks is really not about convenience, they opened all those stores for the benefit of the stock price. They wanted to be able to show year-to-year sales growth. Now, they are just about selling stuff, any stuff to inflate the sales figures.

Posted by Jay Ehret
October 1, 2009

Jay…Thanks for your comment. I really enjoy your website

Nice job with your reExperience Starbucks project!

Posted by David Rich
September 25, 2009

New blog post: Chasing the Fidelity Mirage http://bit.ly/3wp8yW

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Posted by davidjrich
September 25, 2009

Another good read! — Chasing the Fidelity Mirage http://bit.ly/x48jQ

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Posted by novemberbravo
Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType